There is always relative initiative, there is no so-called advantage

Today I read an article by a female friend, comparing and commenting on men’s sex and women’s love. I felt it, and couldn't help but burst out.

“Men have strong bodies and more hormone secretions, so that men always have the upper hand in the relationship between the sexes” - Sex is actually a harmonious interaction, not a war between the jungle and the strong! The reason for the so-called “ "Advantage" is actually because for thousands of years, traditional feudal moral ideas have shackles women so deeply that women always have to be "gentle, virtuous, loyal and obedient" to reflect the purity of love, and dare not take the initiative to express their desires and sexuality. Just a request.

It’s not about who satisfies the other, but about enjoying it together

“When a man wants a woman, he can get it smoothly. It’s as if the woman must satisfy his request out of responsibility. ”

Yes, men have more sexual desires and stronger and more direct sexual requirements, all of which stem from the special physiological differences between the sexes themselves. But this does not mean that men only want sex and not love. For men, what's the point if a woman only passively "satisfies" a man's requirements, without any interaction, enthusiasm, passion, desire, and indifference? At least, I don't want such "satisfaction".

"When a woman wants a man, she has to see if he is in that mood. When a man is not in the mood, it will not help if the woman is anxious." - In today's real life, men have relatively There is heavy social pressure, so when a man is exhausted and has no desire, he naturally loses his physiological response. At this time, should women still blame men for being "selfish"? In fact, men's sex is also inseparable from women's affection, or flirting, which is reflected at this time. A smart woman should know how to help the other person eliminate stress, relieve fatigue, further arouse his enthusiasm, and even stimulate more passion.

Gender differences do not mean that women only need love, not sex. The difference is just that women need to go through those romantic and flirting factors and rituals more before they can finally enjoy happiness. Love between the sexes requires mutual consideration, understanding and cooperation. Just as men should understand women's romantic feelings, women don't have to criticize men's more direct physiological requirements and expressions too much.

How can they be separated by integrating understanding, giving fun, temperament, spirit and flesh?

If a man only loves women forever, and carries out a vigorous spiritual love from Without talking about sex, there are only two situations: one is physical problems, and the other is hypocrisy. No matter how great and selfless he is, how can he ignore his most primitive "sex"? When a man expresses love, he also expresses his sexual desires and sexual thoughts. I think there is nothing wrong with it.

Sex, like love, is a topic full of contradictions: men are more active, women are more passive; men tend to have sexual impulses earlier, while women tend to stay more in experiencing the feeling of love; men Sexual pleasure comes and goes quickly, and women need a relatively long process to achieve it: men’s sexual peak period is mostly between the ages of 20 and 30, while women’s sexual peak period is mostly after the age of 30... Because the world is full of people There are too many discordant stories and contradictions, large and small, for sex to become a topic worth thinking about and exploring.

The union of soul and body, the blend of love and sex, are the most beautiful things in the world. Why should we beautify one half and vilify the other half? I just hope there will be more sincere and persistent love and more harmonious and natural sex in this world. Whether it flows in a plain way or is passionate, as long as each other gives it without any regrets, it will be the rarest and most unforgettable enjoyment and possession.

This article comes from adult.6kmall.com and is published by netizens. This site only quotes it for reference. It does not mean that this site agrees with the views of the article. If you believe that the content and intellectual property rights of this article infringe upon your interests, please contact us.