It is true that marriage is not a perfect institution. The form of having the only sexual partner for life not only goes against the human nature of liking the new and hating the old, but also creates additional problems such as willpower, patience, and tolerance for the parties concerned. It is built on instinct and is destined to be challenged by instinct from time to time. Therefore, the debate on "whether the institution of marriage should be abolished" has been ebbing and flowing. Both parties can find very sufficient arguments to support themselves, such as Heif and Yi Shu. She said: "Marriage is like a gangland. People who have not joined do not know how terrible it is. Once they join, they dare not tell the truth about how terrible it is. Therefore, the inside story Never be known to outsiders.”

These people who are defeated by marriage ultimately choose to deny it. But other than marriage, what is the solution?

British writer Aldous Huxley has studied the "indulgence model" - the biggest feature of this model is the lack of strong and stable feelings, "refinement in indulgence does not produce refinement in sentiment", and no sense of responsibility. Indulgence quickly makes life boring, so it doesn't work. The "free marriage" movement that emerged in Russia also fell silent after a period of excitement. The people involved personally admitted: "I hope to spend time with you in a quiet corner. Doesn't our group understand that this is a human need?" The stability and security brought by the marriage system are indeed incomparable to other The model is incomparable.

In fact, it is meaningless to simply discuss the quality of marriage. It has become increasingly difficult to regulate human nature through institutions. As I write this, I am reminded of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television's ban on TV series about "third parties" being broadcast during prime time. Will the divorce rate really be lower? If we really need to make regulations, it would be better to write it like this: Every "third-party TV series" must provide effective solutions before it can be broadcast. Compared with a simple "ban" word, my opinion is at least somewhat constructive, right?

This article comes from adult.6kmall.com and is published by netizens. This site only quotes it for reference. It does not mean that this site agrees with the views of the article. If you believe that the content and intellectual property rights of this article infringe upon your interests, please contact us.