Love or a house, which one is more important? This problem is vividly interpreted among women born in the 1980s.

A seemingly absurd question, with housing prices soaring today, has become a reality that many young people have to consider: Can love without a house guarantee it be possible to get married and stay together for a lifetime?

Just as real estate tycoon Feng Lun made this assertion last year: "Young women of marriageable age drive up housing prices."

The demand for marriage housing is definitely rigid, so this group of people faces High housing prices are also the most distressing thing. Houses in the city have convenient transportation, good supporting facilities, and convenient life, but the price is high.

House prices in the suburbs are cheap, transportation costs are high, and time costs are high. For the post-80s generation who are in the golden age of career struggle, houses in the suburbs are definitely not the best choice.

In addition, because the post-80s generation has a rather flamboyant personality, boys and girls, who want to be cool, chic, have fun with their own personality, and spend money as they please, would rather become a moonlight earner than let their colleagues and friends think they are Not petty bourgeoisie enough, and summed up his advanced consumption behavior as: live with true style.

I remember reading an article that said: “Young women in Shanghai divide men into four categories: first, those who have a house, a car, and no mortgage; second, those who have a house, a car, and a mortgage; third, those who have no house. No car, no mortgage, but you can have a house, a car, and a mortgage right away, which is a type of people with sufficient cash reserves; fourth, no house, no car, and no mortgage, but you won't have a house, a car, and a mortgage for a long time.

For the first category of men, you can talk about marriage immediately, for the second and third categories, you can talk about marriage after inspection, and for the fourth category of young men who have reached the age of marriage, they can buy a house or have the qualifications to buy a house. Ability has become a prerequisite for finding a partner.

Which is more important, love or a house?

In fact, it is difficult for many people to understand that in real life, two people who are originally in love have to deal with the problem of a house. The individuals eventually parted ways and went their separate ways. Between romance and reality, the IQ of women born in the 1980s is generally not zero.

Look at what girls say: Love is romantic, and a house is the most practical. , What is a home without a house? The man who can give me romance and security is the most suitable for me, and the real best man. At the same time, I would like to remind the sisters born in the 80s that they would rather believe that there are ghosts in this world. I believe that a man in love will talk nonsense and trick you into sleeping with you, only to tell you later that you haven’t bought a house yet.

The boy replied: Beauty, I am from the Beipiao family. Although I am a white-collar worker, I am also poor and busy. A family that is as tired as a dog all day long, lives like a migrant worker, eats like a pig, has a salary that increases as slowly as a snail, and housing prices run as fast as a UFO, go to the suburbs to buy a house, you I feel like I'm not as capable as your colleague's boyfriend, so I'd rather buy a small one-bedroom apartment in the city. Who am I to blame... ..

Is it really true to marry for a house? Maybe you will spit on those who marry for a house, but for many people, practical considerations make it necessary to give up on love. Retreating to a smaller corner of the marriage. When running for survival, love has become a luxury.

In the era of rising housing prices, there must be a break between love and reality, then. Should you marry a house or love?

This article comes from adult.6kmall.com and is published by netizens. This site only quotes it for reference. It does not mean that this site agrees with the views of the article. If you believe that the content and intellectual property rights of this article infringe upon your interests, please contact us.