The traditional dominant men's temperament has shaped men as possessive, dominated, and dominated. According to this statement, men do not need to pay too much attention to women's feelings in their sexual life, they only need to care about their own satisfaction. The attitude towards women should be violent. Moreover, since the male's "sexual center" is the penis, there is no need for sexual caress that has nothing to do with the penis.

For example, when a man performs oral sex on a woman, it has nothing to do with the man's penis. It is only because stimulating the woman's clitoris can bring her good sexual enjoyment. Oral sex for women is largely a matter of simply "serving" women, which can also be understood as a performance that undermines dominant masculinity.

However, our interviewees generally emphasized the sexual caressing of women and the importance of making women feel happy in their sex lives. What particularly surprised me was that almost all The interviewees all said that they love oral sex on women and that oral sex on women is an important part of their sex lives.

Rich men are very keen on giving oral sex to women

Only 008 of our interviewees clearly stated that they do not like giving oral sex to women. 008 said that he likes oral sex from his female partner. As for oral sex from his female partner, "I tried it 1-2 times a long time ago out of curiosity, but then I never tried it again." I asked him if this was because he thought oral sex was harmful to the female partner. It is an insult to a man's dignity. 008's reply was: "No, it's because I feel dirty."

When I asked him if he felt dirty because of the smell of vaginal secretions, and whether it was okay. When he was no longer "dirty" through serious cleaning, 008 said: "It's not physically dirty, but psychologically I feel dirty." This psychological feeling that women are "dirty" can still be understood as dominance. The shaping of "men as noble and women as humble" by masculinity is universal among ordinary men.

Except for 008, every one of our interviewees often performed oral sex on their female partners, and most of them even clearly expressed their love for oral sex.

All the interviewees who like oral sex emphasized that oral sex is something that “benefits others and benefits themselves”.

The statement stated that oral sex on a woman does not damage one’s dignity and masculinity, and is a mutually beneficial thing. This is a common thread among our interviewees. Does this kind of relationship that does not distinguish between domination and dominance in sexual life indicate that the interviewees have gender equality values? In my opinion, it is far from that simple. 016's statement is representative: "I only perform oral sex with my wife and girlfriend. Others can give me oral sex without feeling that my wife and girlfriend are dirty. I will not perform oral sex with other people because I think they are unclean."< /p>

It is not difficult to see that there is a choice in the interviewee’s behavior of giving oral sex to a woman. The result of this selection is to filter out the "dirty" female companions with whom they have stable, loving relationships. It can be seen that "dirty" has always been a psychological problem, not a physical problem. It is also in this choice that we see that the underlying derogation achieved by judging certain women as "dirty" still continues.

We have reason to infer that the focus on the other person’s feelings during sexual behavior and the pursuit of mutual pleasure for both parties are just a strategic choice to obtain higher sexual enjoyment, and do not reflect the inner feelings of the interviewee. If he truly implements the concept of complete equality in sexual relations between the sexes, it does not mean that he has practiced gender equality at a higher level of life and society.

This article comes from adult.6kmall.com and is published by netizens. This site only quotes it for reference. It does not mean that this site agrees with the views of the article. If you believe that the content and intellectual property rights of this article infringe upon your interests, please contact us.