In a business society, everything can be calculated using input-output. Marriage can actually be regarded as a risky investment that requires two people to operate it together. How to choose a good partner for yourself? We might as well use economic principles to plan it.

Premise: Dating is different from choosing an apple. Eve said to Adam: "My dear, do you love me with all your heart?" Adam sighed: "Of course. Besides you, who else can I have?" What choice? "There is a term in economics "Hobbes' choice", which means "no choice". In societies with underdeveloped business competition, "Hobbes' choices" are common, such as the monotonous clothing styles of Chinese people many years ago, and the expensive initial installation fees for telephones a few years ago. This kind of trouble is a headache for everyone. After all, it is not something we can change personally. With the development of competition, this worry has been greatly reduced compared with the past. But another trouble comes up: too many choices are dizzying. There is an optimal strategy for everything from the choice of life path to the country's major policies. Everyone wants to have choices, and wants to make the right choice - even if it is not the best, at least it is better. So are there some methods to help us? Process: Find him in the crowd. Play a "dating game" on Qianbaidu: Suppose you are a woman and decide to get married. There are 100 suitable single men in your social circle who are interested in pursuing you. Choose the best one among them. Marriage partner, this is not an easy thing, what can you do to achieve this result? The conditions of this game are strictly limited: you can only date each person once, and you can only decide whether to choose or give up on the spot. You cannot "freeze" them as a backup. Once you choose one of them, you have no chance to date anyone else. . This restriction makes sense, because in life, in most cases, opportunities wait for no one. By the time you choose, someone may have already become someone else's wishful man. You have to start dating, but dating is different from choosing apples. When choosing apples, you can compare two apples, but in this game you can only date one person at a time, and you must decide on this person immediately after each date. Is it possible to be the best one even though there are many people you haven't dated yet. Once one lucky guy is chosen, you stop dating. There is also a game plan that must be adhered to, once you decide to eliminate this person after the date, he is out for good. You can assume that he married someone else, or became a monk out of frustration, or even ran off a cliff and died. The point is that you can't date every candidate, label them with a ranking, store them on a shelf in a warehouse, and then pick the best one. You want to choose the best partner, but how can you maximize the chance of finding your ideal partner under the established rules? Strategy: Don’t pick the first person you meet. The winning strategy is the strategy that gives you the best chance of success. Even though you are not 100% sure, you know that what you want is the greatest chance of success. Obviously, you shouldn't choose the first person you meet, because the chance of him being ranked first out of 100 is only 1%. This chance can be said to be very slim. Putting the chips directly on the first person is also the worst bet. But here's a question: What if the first person you date happens to be the best one? If you eliminate him, the person you date in the future will be "a crab worse than a crab". Wouldn't it be a lifelong regret? There are indeed some couples around us who are first lovers and seem to be doing well. But here we are talking about strategy, not destiny or fate. As long as you are not very superstitious, you will definitely admit that it is better to take control of your future instead of leaving it to chance. As I said before, you shouldn't choose the first person who comes along because your chances of meeting your perfect partner on the first date are slim. Even if this person is really good, you still have to reluctantly give up because you don't know where he ranks among these 100 people. Again: this is just a game. In the game, this woman originally knew nothing about these 100 people, but in life, even if you have never been in love, you know a lot about the opposite sex. To a large extent, you already know what kind of men you can date. , what kind of can't. So if you meet a good man in reality, you should keep him, and as long as you are not married, "riding for a horse" cannot be considered immoral!

${FDPageBreak} Tip: Victims and Experiments One of the most effective methods is to use the group of people you met earlier as guinea pigs. If you meet someone better than this group of people later, you can consider marrying them. Gave it to him. All you have to do is take some experience from the previous group and use it as a basis for evaluating others. So how many samples should be taken to make experimental products? This is a dilemma. If you take too few "samples", the conclusion you draw may not be accurate; but if you take too many samples, the conclusion will be accurate, but you may miss the best choice (he happens to In sampling, was sacrificed). So, is there an optimal number of samples? If so, how much is it? Three disciples of Socrates once asked their teacher for advice: How to find an ideal partner? Socrates took them to a wheat field and asked them to move forward in a straight line along the edge of the field without retreating. They were only given one chance to pick the largest ear of wheat. The first disciple walked a few steps and saw a big and beautiful ear of wheat, and happily picked it. But when he continued to move forward, he found that there were many branches in front of him that were bigger than the one he picked, so he had to finish the whole journey with regret. The second disciple learned his lesson, and whenever he was about to pick it, he always reminded himself that there was a better one behind. When he was almost at the end, he realized that he had missed all the opportunities, so he had to make do with one. The third disciple learned the lessons of the first two. When he walked 1/3, he divided into three categories: large, medium and small. He then checked whether it was correct when he walked 1/3. When he reached the last 1/3, he chose A beautiful ear of wheat belonging to a large category. Although this was not necessarily the biggest and most beautiful branch, he completed the whole process with satisfaction - because he knew that he had achieved the best result possible. Pay attention to the strategy of the disciple with the best results: 1/3. Why is this an ideal ratio? It turns out that the best search strategy for choosing the best person is to calmly compare several samples and choose the next one that is higher than them all. The risk of losing the best choice is about 1/3, but you have done your best, and you still have about a 1/3 chance of picking the one you want most among the 100. In fact, when you choose among 100 people, a 1/3 chance is considered good. Voice: Falling in love is easy, starting a family is difficult; falling in love is easy, but getting along is difficult. The science of love games tries to use the greatest rationality to guide relationships. If you hope to have a love with the purpose of marriage, this is a good reference.

This article comes from adult.6kmall.com and is published by netizens. This site only quotes it for reference. It does not mean that this site agrees with the views of the article. If you believe that the content and intellectual property rights of this article infringe upon your interests, please contact us.