In fact, "rich second generation" is just a colloquial expression so far, and there is no strict standard or definition. A few decades ago, when we talked about "wealth", we used "households worth ten thousand yuan" as a symbol. According to calculations by Professor Zhong Wei, director of the Financial Research Center of Beijing Normal University, based on per capita monetary income or the average salary of urban workers, 10,000 yuan 30 years ago is roughly equivalent to nearly 300,000 yuan now. If the "rich second generation" is established based on this standard, it has no research value. So, how much wealth do children of their parents have to be considered a "rich second generation"? 1 million or 10 million? Without standards, there is no classification object. Just like there are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand viewers, there are different standards for the "rich second generation" in the eyes of different female college students.

Although the willingness to marry a "rich second generation" is a pseudo-issue, it is an indisputable fact that college students have a secularized view of marriage and love. "There are always two sides to a coin." A small number of college students are affected by money worship and hedonism, and the trend of "marrying well is worse than doing well" is on the rise. This influence has penetrated into the campus, further socializing and secularizing college students' views on marriage and love, and the emergence of "rush to marriage" and the idea of ​​"marrying the rich second generation" and "sparing decades of hard work".

I suggest that we look at the phenomenon of the "rich second generation" objectively and do not exaggerate or hype it, because this can easily put the "rich second generation" under the pressure of public opinion. At the same time, it can also easily lead to hatred of the rich.

This article comes from adult.6kmall.com and is published by netizens. This site only quotes it for reference. It does not mean that this site agrees with the views of the article. If you believe that the content and intellectual property rights of this article infringe upon your interests, please contact us.