Mr. Shen Hongfei said something. I have forgotten the original text, but I remember the general meaning. He said that it is much more difficult for a man to win over a woman than for a woman to win over a man. Shen’s argument goes something like this. If a man wants to win over a woman, he has to buy her gifts, take her to dinner, coax her, and create romance and surprises for her. In the end, the woman may not be happy; It's relatively easy to get off a man, as long as you take off your clothes, that's it.

When I read Mr. Shen’s words, I couldn’t help laughing. I think this is probably because men and women have different understandings of "taking". For men, maybe "taking" a woman means "going to bed" with her, but for women, it is just "taking a man" What's the point of "taking" a man to bed?

Most married women have successfully "taken" a man to bed, but not all marriages can start and end well. The deep love once felt like a lifetime ago, and there are countless examples of beauties dying before they grow old. For a woman, if she doesn’t expect a man to love her for the rest of her life, then why bother marrying him? Maybe many women will say, I don’t expect him to love me for the rest of my life, I just want him to love me. Just let go when it's time for me. If a woman who says this is not deeply involved in the world, she has already experienced many vicissitudes of life. But most women don't like to fall in love with a man when they are young and kiss him goodbye when they reach middle age. When a plot like that is incorporated into a movie, it earns the audience's tears, but when it happens to us, every tear we shed is our own.

I read a memoir of Madame Pompidou very early on. She was the lover of King Louis XV of France. In her memoirs, she wrote candidly about the many emotional crises she experienced - "because the men surrounding the king wanted to give him the most beautiful women to please him, and the king himself fell in love easily. ". Madame Pompidou was very anxious about this. She lamented that she had to fight continuously throughout her life and could not stop, until a palace lady comforted her: "No matter how much the king likes fresh women, he is already used to your stairs. He likes to go up and down with you. "At that moment, Madame Pompidou felt relieved - you may be younger and more beautiful than me and have given birth to the king's offspring, but I am the king's "habit".

Madame Pompidou became the mistress of Louis XV in 1745, and this relationship lasted until her death in 1764. Her cleverness was that she did not completely fixate on the king—— She built the Evreux Palace, today's Elysee Palace, the French presidential palace, and funded the publication of the "Encyclopedia". Under her care, French literature and art flourished unprecedentedly, and Voltaire's famous tragedy "Tancredi" was dedicated to her. On the one hand, she made herself a "habit" of the king, and on the other hand, she kept doing this and that, quietly attracting the king's attention. Those "Encyclopedia", "Tancredi", and the Elysee Palace at least It opened another window for her so that she would not become an anxious, perverted and moody woman by thinking about her emotional crises all day long.

I often recommend that married women who are emotionally tortured read the Memoirs of Madame Pompidou - not to say not to blame men for having a different relationship, but to say that since you have encountered such a Men, and you can't let go, then you have to learn from Madame Pompidou. Love is like a battlefield. Generals die in a hundred battles, and strong men return after ten years. Of course, having said that, if you have done everything you should do, but your man is not as nostalgic as Louis XV, then haven't you still left a world for yourself? In that world, isn't there the "Encyclopedia" , "Tancredi", Elysee Palace?

This article comes from adult.6kmall.com and is published by netizens. This site only quotes it for reference. It does not mean that this site agrees with the views of the article. If you believe that the content and intellectual property rights of this article infringe upon your interests, please contact us.